Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 162/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim.

Case Number III CSK 162/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a payment claim between two companies, with the defendant arguing errors in the lower court's legal application. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly or if the judgment is contrary to the law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance incorrect application of law payment claim dispute commercial litigation Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 162/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 lutego 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa C. sp. z o.o. sp.k. z siedzibą w K. (poprzednio M. sp. z o.o. sp.k. w K.)‎przeciwko B. S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 lutego 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 30 stycznia 2019 r., sygn. akt I AGa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.