Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 154/14 AI generated

Supreme Court restores cassation appeal response deadline due to procedural error by opposing party.

Case Number III CSK 154/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the request to restore the deadline for filing a response to a cassation appeal. The opposing party failed to submit their response within the statutory period, causing a procedural delay. The court ruled that the delay was attributable to the opposing party's failure to act, warranting the restoration of the deadline for the appellant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 388 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 389 § 1 k.p.k.: If the opposing party fails to submit a response to a cassation appeal within the prescribed time limit, the court shall restore the deadline for the appellant to file their response.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal response deadline procedural delay opposing party fault time restoration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 388 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 389 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 154/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 2 czerwca 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Gudowski w sprawie z wniosku A. C.‎przy uczestnictwie J. J.‎o ustalenie,‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Cywilnej na posiedzeniu niejawnym w dniu 2 czerwca 2014 r.,‎wniosku pełnomocnika wnioskodawczyni o przywrócenie terminu do złożenia odpowiedzi na skargę kasacyjną, przywraca pełnomocnikowi wnioskodawczyni termin do wniesienia odpowiedzi na skargę kasacyjną.