Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 137/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeals to be heard regarding a request to terminate co-ownership.

Case Number III CSK 137/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation appeals filed by the claimants against the Lower Regional Court's decision. The dispute concerns a request to terminate co-ownership, which the lower court had previously ruled upon. The Court decided to proceed with the hearing of the appeals to review the legal basis of the lower court's judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation appeals if the lower court's decision violates the law or if the facts are unclear, allowing the case to be heard for a final ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance termination of co-ownership Supreme Court jurisdiction civil procedure law lower court decision review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 137/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 czerwca 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Hubert Wrzeszcz w sprawie z wniosku D. K. i P. L. ‎przy uczestnictwie G. S. ‎o zniesienie współwłasności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 czerwca 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawczyni D. K. oraz skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy P. L. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krakowie‎z dnia 21 października 2015 r., sygn. akt II Ca 341/15, przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.