Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 136/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal to establish necessary easement despite opposing parties' objections.

Case Number III CSK 136/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the applicant to establish a necessary road easement. The lower court had previously rejected the request, but the Supreme Court found the procedural grounds for rejection insufficient. Consequently, the appeal is admitted for further examination to determine the validity of the easement claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court admits a cassation appeal when the lower court's decision violates the law or fails to address essential procedural requirements, thereby necessitating a review of the easement claim.

Keywords

AI generated
necessary easement road easement cassation appeal Supreme Court procedural violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 136/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 maja 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z wniosku E. M. ‎przy uczestnictwie A. P. , E. B. P. i J. L.‎o ustanowienie służebności drogi koniecznej,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 maja 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestników A. P. i E. B. P. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w T. ‎z dnia 11 grudnia 2018 r., sygn. akt I Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE