Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 13/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine invalidity of contract in commercial dispute.

Case Number III CSK 13/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns the invalidity of a commercial contract between the plaintiff and the defendant company. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal to determine the validity of a contract when the lower court's decision requires further factual or legal clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admission contract invalidity determination commercial contract dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 475/14
Court dismisses bank's appeal in loan contract dispute, upholding lower court's judgment for plaintiffs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 13/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 maja 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Strzelczyk w sprawie z powództwa J. T.‎przeciwko J. sp. z o.o. w K.‎o ustalenie nieważności umowy,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 7 maja 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwane A. sp. z o.o. w K. od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie‎z dnia 16 czerwca 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa 475/14, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. l.n