Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 101/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation to determine invalidity of loan contract due to lack of written form.

Case Number III CSK 101/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the plaintiff's cassation appeal to review the lower court's decision on the invalidity of a loan contract. The plaintiff argued the contract was void because it lacked the mandatory written form required by law, while the defendant contended the agreement was valid. The court decided to proceed with the review because the statutory requirement for written form was not met in this specific case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 351 ust. 1 Kodeks cywilny; Art. 352 Kodeks cywilny: A loan contract concluded without the required written form is void, and the court must examine the validity of such agreements upon cassation appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
loan contract validity written form requirement cassation appeal acceptance civil code provisions contractual invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 351 ust. 1 Kodeks cywilny
Art. 352 Kodeks cywilny

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 101/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 września 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Maria Szulc w sprawie z powództwa K. J.‎przeciwko Bankowi (…) S.A. z siedzibą w W.‎o ustalenie nieważności umowy,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 września 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 13 października 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACz (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.