Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CSK 100/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review contract invalidity claim based on specific legal grounds.

Case Number III CSK 100/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the appellant's cassation complaint for further examination of the contract invalidity claim. The appellant argued the contract was void due to specific defects, while the appellee contested this assertion. The court decided to admit the appeal to allow the lower court's judgment to be reviewed on the merits of the legal arguments presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation complaint if the lower court's judgment violates the law or fails to apply the law correctly, even if the complaint does not meet all formal requirements for immediate rejection.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal contract invalidity civil procedure Supreme Court legal error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CSK 100/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 maja 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa D. […] S.A. w W. w likwidacji‎przeciwko H. […] sp. z o.o. w K. ‎o uznanie umowy za bezskuteczną,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 maja 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 24 września 2015 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.