Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 892/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against district court's refusal to designate competent court due to lack of reasoning.

Case Number III CO 892/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the district court's order refusing to designate a competent court. The district court had rejected the designation request because the lower court's decision lacked sufficient reasoning. The Supreme Court held that the absence of a reasoned explanation in the district court's order was a fatal procedural defect requiring remittal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.: A decision refusing to designate a competent court must be reasoned; failure to provide reasons constitutes a ground for appeal and remittal.

Keywords

AI generated
competent court designation lack of reasoning procedural defect remittal to lower court civil procedure appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 892/23 POSTANOWIENIE 7 grudnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela na posiedzeniu niejawnym 7 grudnia 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M. K.‎przeciwko S. K.‎o rozwód,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Lublinie‎postanowieniem z 17 października 2023 r., III C 2117/23,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego z uwagi na brak uzasadnienia postanowienia. [S.J.] [ał] UZASADNIENIE