Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 8/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against transfer order due to lack of jurisdictional grounds for transfer.

Case Number III CO 8/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by A. T. against the Lower Court's order to transfer the case to another court of equal jurisdiction. The appellant argued that the dispute over payment to the City of Łódź required a different forum, but the Lower Court found no legal basis for such a transfer. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the decision to keep the proceedings in the original court, rejecting the procedural objection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.: The court of first instance retains jurisdiction when no statutory grounds exist to transfer the case to another court of equal jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of proceedings court of equal jurisdiction civil procedure code jurisdictional objection appeal dismissal payment dispute procedural transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 8/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 2 marca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mariusz Załucki w sprawie z powództwa A. T.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Prezydentowi Miasta Łódź‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym 2 marca 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi‎postanowieniem z 21 grudnia 2022 r., sygn. akt II C 1006/20,‎o przekazanie do rozpoznania do innego sądu równorzędnego odmawia przekazania sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi.