Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 784/22 AI generated

Supreme Court denies designation of competent court for divorce proceedings due to lack of jurisdictional grounds.

Case Number III CO 784/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to designate a competent court for divorce proceedings initiated by W. L. against M. R. The lower court in Bydgoszcz failed to identify a proper forum, prompting the Supreme Court's intervention. The court determined that no specific jurisdictional criteria were met to transfer or designate the case, resulting in the dismissal of the designation request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 100 k.p.c.: When no specific jurisdictional ground exists to designate a court, the request for designation is rejected as the case remains with the original court or lacks a designated forum.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure court designation divorce proceedings jurisdictional competence Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 784/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 września 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa W. L.‎przeciwko M. R.‎o rozwód,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 września 2022 r.,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Bydgoszczy o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy X C 2316/21, odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy.