Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 766/25 AI generated

Supreme Court designates Krakow District Court as competent court for divorce proceedings between M.J. and M.J.1.

Case Number III CO 766/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court designated the District Court in Krakow as the competent court for the divorce proceedings initiated by M.J. against M.J.1. The lower court had previously determined Krakow as the proper venue, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the proceedings will continue in Krakow rather than the originally proposed location.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court of the place where the defendant resides is competent for divorce proceedings; the Supreme Court confirmed the District Court in Krakow as the proper venue based on the defendant's residence.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce proceedings competent court residence rule venue designation family law jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 766/25 POSTANOWIENIE 29 lipca 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 29 lipca 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M.J.‎przeciwko M.J.1‎o rozwód,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie‎postanowieniem z 9 czerwca 2025 r., XI C 1603/25,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie jako właściwy. M.L.[SOP] ‎