Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 655/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for divorce case where lower court refused to designate venue due to lack of reasoning.

Case Number III CO 655/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the lower court's refusal to designate a competent court for the divorce proceedings. The lower court had rejected the request to designate a venue because the initial decision lacked sufficient reasoning, a procedural defect the plaintiff argued warranted intervention. The Supreme Court found that the lower court's decision was procedurally sound and did not require designation, thereby upholding the original ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 101 § 1 k.p.c.: A court's refusal to designate a competent court based on a lack of reasoning in the initial decision does not constitute a ground for appeal if the refusal itself is procedurally justified.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure venue designation lack of reasoning appeal dismissal competent court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 101 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 655/24 POSTANOWIENIE 26 czerwca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela na posiedzeniu niejawnym 26 czerwca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa W. J.‎przeciwko W. J.‎o rozwód,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Radomiu‎postanowieniem z 20 maja 2024 r., I C 445/24,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego ze względu na brak uzasadnienia postanowienia. [SOP](r.g.) ‎