Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 65/15 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge recusal request against two judges while allowing it against one judge.

Case Number III CO 65/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially dismissed the plaintiff's request to exclude judges from the appellate court proceedings. The plaintiff sought to remove three judges, but the court found sufficient grounds to exclude only two of them, M. K.-T. and T. R., while rejecting the request against the third judge. Consequently, the proceedings were terminated regarding the excluded judges but continued against the remaining judge.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.: A recusal request is granted only if the judge's impartiality is reasonably doubted based on specific facts; the court must evaluate the relevance of the alleged conflict to the specific case.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges impartiality doubt appellate court judge exclusion procedural termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 65/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 19 listopada 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Gudowski w sprawie z powództwa M. W.‎przeciwko J. S.‎o ustalenie,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 19 listopada 2015 r.,‎wniosku powódki o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […], M. K.-T., […],T. R., […] umarza postępowanie wywołane wnioskiem o wyłączenie sędziego w stosunku do sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […] M. K.-T. oraz T. R., a w pozostałym zakresie wniosek oddala.