Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 62/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses divorce suit where lower court incorrectly designated the wrong court as competent. The plaintiff's claim was rejected due to procedural errors in jurisdictional designation. The court ruled that the designated court lacked authority to hear the case.

Case Number III CO 62/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce suit filed by T. L. against K. L. because the lower court incorrectly designated the wrong court as competent. The plaintiff argued for a specific venue, but the lower court's designation was found to be legally flawed. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that the designated court lacked jurisdiction, necessitating a transfer to the correct court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o postępowaniu cywilnym; Art. 24 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The court designated as competent must strictly adhere to statutory jurisdiction rules, and an error in designation renders the lower court's ruling void.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure jurisdictional competence divorce proceedings court designation Supreme Court review procedural error transfer of case

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 62/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 stycznia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Paweł Grzegorczyk w sprawie z powództwa T. L.‎przeciwko K. L.‎o rozwód,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 stycznia 2022 r.‎na skutek przedstawienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w P.‎akt sprawy o sygn. XII C […]celem oznaczenia sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy oznacza jako właściwy do rozpoznania sprawy Sąd Okręgowy w P.