Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 604/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against lower court's refusal to designate competent court due to lack of reasoning.

Case Number III CO 604/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by B. A. and A. A. against the Lublin District Court's refusal to designate a competent court. The plaintiffs argued that the lower court's decision lacked necessary legal reasoning, while the opposing bank contended the procedural grounds were sufficient. The court ruled that the absence of a substantive justification in the lower court's order did not warrant overturning the designation decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.: A decision refusing to designate a competent court is not subject to appeal if it lacks a substantive legal justification.

Keywords

AI generated
competent court designation lack of reasoning procedural appeal Supreme Court review civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 234 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 604/24 POSTANOWIENIE 26 czerwca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela na posiedzeniu niejawnym 26 czerwca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa B. A. i A. A.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w G.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Lublinie‎postanowieniem z 16 maja 2024 r., I C 346/24,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, odmawia oznaczenia sądu właściwego z uwagi na brak uzasadnienia postanowienia. [SOP](r.g.)