Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 558/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding jurisdiction over bankruptcy proceedings against a bank's administrator.

Case Number III CO 558/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by K. I. and M. I. against the District Court in Gdańsk's designation as the competent court. The plaintiffs argued for a different venue, but the lower court correctly identified the bankruptcy administrator's location as the determining factor for jurisdiction. The Court upheld the original decision, confirming that the District Court in Gdańsk remains the proper authority to hear the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court of the place where the debtor's assets are located or where the bankruptcy administrator is established has jurisdiction over proceedings against the administrator in bankruptcy proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy proceedings jurisdiction rules bank administrator competent court civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 558/24 POSTANOWIENIE 24 maja 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak na posiedzeniu niejawnym 24 maja 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa K. I. i M. I.‎przeciwko Syndykowi Masy Upadłości Bank‎o ustalenie,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie‎postanowieniem z 23 kwietnia 2024 r., XXVIII C 17083/23,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Gdańsku, jako właściwy do rozpoznania sprawy. [SOP] [ms] ‎