Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 548/26 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, confirming Olsztyn District Court as the competent court for the case.

Case Number III CO 548/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the District Court in Olsztyn as the competent forum. The plaintiffs sought payment and jurisdiction determination against a bank, while the lower court designated Olsztyn based on Article 45 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court ruled that the lower court's designation was correct and the appeal lacked merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 § 1 k.p.c.; The court competent for a case is determined by the location of the defendant's domicile or the place of the legal relationship, and an appeal against such designation is inadmissible if the lower court's decision was legally sound.

Keywords

AI generated
competent court determination jurisdiction appeal Code of Civil Procedure district court designation plaintiff bank dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 45 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 548/26 POSTANOWIENIE 27 maja 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Grzesiowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 maja 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa T.Z. i J.Z.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Olsztynie‎postanowieniem z 22 kwietnia 2026 r., I C 859/24,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Olsztynie jako właściwy ‎do rozpoznania sprawy (art. 45 § 1 k.p.c.). (K.W.)[SOP]