Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 488/24 AI generated

Supreme Court designates Krakow District Court as proper venue for divorce suit filed by A. Z. against R. Z.

Case Number III CO 488/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court designated the Krakow District Court as the proper venue for a divorce suit filed by A. Z. against R. Z. The lower court had previously designated a different court, prompting this appeal. The Supreme Court reviewed the jurisdictional arguments and determined that Krakow was the correct forum based on the specific facts of the case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed to correct the procedural error regarding venue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court of the place of the defendant's domicile or the place where the marriage was celebrated shall be competent, and the Supreme Court designated Krakow as the proper venue.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure jurisdiction divorce suit venue designation domicile rule Supreme Court procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 488/24 POSTANOWIENIE 14 maja 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 14 maja 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa A. Z.‎przeciwko R. Z.‎o rozwód,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie‎postanowieniem z 17 kwietnia 2024 r., XI C 3824/23,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, oznaczyć Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie jako sąd, przed który należy wytoczyć powództwo.[SOP][ał] Kliknij tutaj, aby wprowadzić tekst. ‎