Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 486/26 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers civil compensation case from Rybnik to Wrocław court under Art. 441 § 1 k.p.c.

Case Number III CO 486/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to keep the case in Rybnik and ordered its transfer to Wrocław. The plaintiffs sought compensation against defendants, but the Lower Regional Court in Rybnik had already decided to transfer the matter to a court of equal jurisdiction. The Supreme Court upheld this procedural decision based on the specific provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding court transfers.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 441 § 1 k.p.c.; The Supreme Court may transfer a civil case to a court of equal jurisdiction when the lower court determines that such a transfer is necessary for the proper administration of justice.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure court transfer equal jurisdiction procedural disposition Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 441 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 441 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 486/26 POSTANOWIENIE 21 maja 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 21 maja 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa S.G., J.G.‎przeciwko Ł.P., K.M., T.K., M.P.‎o zadośćuczynienie,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Rybniku‎postanowieniem z 10 kwietnia 2026 r., I C 306/26,‎o przekazanie do sądu równorzędnego, przekazuje sprawę do rozpoznania Sądowi Okręgowemu we Wrocławiu (art. 441 § 1 k.p.c.). (K.L.)[SOP]‎