Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 482/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to exclude judges due to lack of specific grounds for recusal. The court rejects the request to remove judges from the case. The decision upholds the original panel's composition. The court finds no valid reason to exclude the judges. The ruling confirms the procedural validity of the current bench. The case concludes with the appeal being rejected. The legal issue centers on judicial recusal grounds. The outcome favors the maintenance of the original court panel.

Case Number III CO 482/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the Housing Cooperative and other defendants regarding the invalidity of a resolution. The appellant requested the exclusion of specific judges from the appellate court based on arguments presented by the appellate court's own judges. The court rejected this request because the grounds for recusal were not sufficiently substantiated to warrant removing the judges from the case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the original panel of judges remains responsible for the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 232 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to exclude judges must be based on specific, legally defined grounds; without such substantiation, the court must reject the request and maintain the original panel.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal exclusion of judges grounds for recusal appellate court composition procedural dismissal supreme court ruling civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 232 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 482/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 25 maja 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marcin Łochowski w sprawie z powództwa K. S.‎przeciwko Spółdzielni Mieszkaniowej „[…]” w S., T. P., W. B., B. B. i J. R.‎o stwierdzenie nieważności uchwały, na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 25 maja 2022 r., na skutek przedstawienia przez Sąd Apelacyjny w […]wniosków sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]o wyłączenie od rozpoznania sprawy sygn. akt I ACz […], wyłącza od rozpoznania sprawy sygn. akt I ACz […] sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […] oraz sędziego delegowanego do Sądu Apelacyjnego w […] - sędziego Sądu Rejonowego J. K.