Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 474/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding jurisdiction determination under Article 45 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number III CO 474/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the District Court's designation of itself as the competent court for the lawsuit. The plaintiff sought to establish a claim against the bank, while the District Court correctly identified its own jurisdiction under Article 45 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Court ruled that the lower court's decision to hear the case was legally sound and required no correction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 45 k.p.c.; The court designated by the lower court as competent under Article 45 of the Civil Procedure Code is not subject to appeal on jurisdictional grounds.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code jurisdiction determination competent court appeal dismissal district court authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 45 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 474/25 POSTANOWIENIE 7 maja 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Ireneusz Kunicki na posiedzeniu niejawnym 7 maja 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M. K.‎przeciwko Bankowi‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie‎postanowieniem z 29 stycznia 2025 r., XXVIII C 10336/23,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie jako sąd, przed który należy wytoczyć powództwo (art. 45 k.p.c.). [SOP] ‎