Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 446/26 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to transfer civil debt case to another court of equal jurisdiction.

Case Number III CO 446/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to transfer the civil debt case to another court of equal jurisdiction. The lower court in Rybnik refused the transfer, citing the absence of valid grounds for such a procedural move. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision, confirming that the original court retains jurisdiction over the dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 239 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to transfer a case to another court of equal jurisdiction is rejected when the statutory conditions for transfer are not met and the original court is competent to hear the matter.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure transfer of jurisdiction equal courts court of first instance procedural economy competence plaintiff's request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 239 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 446/26 POSTANOWIENIE 25 maja 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Maciej Kowalski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 25 maja 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa J.J.‎przeciwko A.S. o zapłatę,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Rybniku‎postanowieniem z 31 marca 2026 r., I C 2303/25,‎o przekazanie do sądu równorzędnego, odmawia przekazania sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi równorzędnemu. (a.z.)[SOP]