Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 43/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge recusal request against one judge but allows it against another in civil proceedings.

Case Number III CO 43/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially dismissed the defendant's request to recuse judges from the appeal court. While the request to remove Judge A. S. was rejected, the court granted the request to remove Judge B. S. based on specific grounds. The decision distinguishes between the two judges by applying different legal standards to their respective potential conflicts of interest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 237 § 2 k.p.c.: A recusal request is admissible only if the grounds are established; the court must evaluate each judge's situation independently, allowing recusal for one judge while rejecting it for another if the specific circumstances do not meet the statutory threshold.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judges conflict of interest civil proceedings appeal court independent evaluation statutory threshold partial dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 237 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 43/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 maja 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosława Wysocka (przewodniczący)‎SSN Grzegorz Misiurek (sprawozdawca)‎SSN Kazimierz Zawada w sprawie z powództwa Gminy Miejskiej K.‎przeciwko M. W. i G. W.‎o zapłatę,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 maja 2019 r.,‎wniosku pozwanej M. W. o wyłączenie sędziów Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]: […] 1. umarza postępowanie w zakresie wniosku o wyłączenie sędziego A. S.; 2. oddala wniosek w pozostałym zakresie.