Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 299/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses divorce suit because the wrong court was designated as competent to hear the case.

Case Number III CO 299/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce action filed by W.R. against M.R. because the Lower Court in Krośnie incorrectly designated itself as the competent court. The plaintiff argued for a different venue, but the court found the Lower Court's designation of itself under Article 45 of the Code of Civil Procedure to be erroneous. Consequently, the proceedings were terminated without a substantive ruling on the divorce request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 k.p.c.; The court designated as competent by a lower court must be the one with jurisdiction according to the law; a designation of the same court is invalid if it contradicts statutory rules on venue.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce action court competence venue designation Code of Civil Procedure jurisdiction error dismissal of suit lower court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 45 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 299/23 POSTANOWIENIE 27 czerwca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Ewa Stefańska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 czerwca 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z powództwa W.R.‎przeciwko M.R.‎o rozwód małżeństwa,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Krośnie‎postanowieniem z 8 lutego 2023 r., I C 112/22,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Krośnie jako sąd, przed który należy wytoczyć powództwo (art. 45 k.p.c.). UZASADNIENIE(A.G.)[ms]