Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 285/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses divorce complaint for lack of jurisdiction, ruling the lower court was the correct venue.

Case Number III CO 285/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce complaint because the lower court was not the proper venue. The plaintiff sought to file the action in a specific district court, but the Supreme Court determined that the District Court in Z. held jurisdiction. Consequently, the complaint was rejected as procedurally inadmissible due to the incorrect designation of the court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court designated by the lower court for determining jurisdiction is the competent court to hear the action, rendering a complaint against the wrong court inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure jurisdiction venue divorce action inadmissible complaint competent court procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 285/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mariusz Załucki w sprawie z powództwa K. K.‎przeciwko X. K.‎o rozwód,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek przedstawienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Z.akt o sygn. I C […]celem oznaczenia sądu przed którym należy wytoczyć powództwo, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Z. jako właściwy do rozpoznania sprawy.