Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 237/26 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses transfer request, ruling the case belongs to the court that originally accepted it.

Case Number III CO 237/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to transfer the case to another court of equal jurisdiction. The Regional Court had previously refused to transfer the matter, citing that the case fell within its own statutory competence. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, confirming that the original court retained jurisdiction over the dispute between the company and the bank.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

SOP art. 240 ust. 1; art. 241 ust. 1: The court of first instance that accepted the case retains jurisdiction if the transfer request is based on a procedural error by the lower court, and the Supreme Court will not remand the case to a different court of equal jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of proceedings court of equal jurisdiction SOP article 240 procedural competence dismissal of transfer request civil procedure law jurisdictional retention

Cited Legislation

AI generated
SOP art. 240 ust. 1
SOP art. 241 ust. 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 237/26 POSTANOWIENIE 25 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Mariusz Łodko na posiedzeniu niejawnym 25 marca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa C. spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w P.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy - Woli w Warszawie‎postanowieniem z 18 lutego 2026 r., I C 237/26,‎o przekazanie sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi równorzędnemu, odmawia przekazania sprawy innemu sądowi równorzędnemu. [wr][SOP]