Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 232/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses divorce complaint because the wrong court was designated as competent to hear the case.

Case Number III CO 232/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce complaint filed by K.G. against K.T. because the Lower Court in Nowy Sącz incorrectly designated itself as the competent court. The plaintiff argued for a specific venue, but the court ruled that the Lower Court's designation violated the jurisdictional rules under Article 45 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the complaint was rejected as inadmissible due to the lack of proper jurisdiction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 45 k.p.c.; Art. 100 k.p.c.: A divorce complaint must be filed before the court designated as competent; if the lower court incorrectly designates itself, the complaint is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce jurisdiction competent court designation Code of Civil Procedure inadmissible complaint venue rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 232/23 POSTANOWIENIE 24 maja 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: Prezes SN Joanna Misztal-Konecka na posiedzeniu niejawnym 24 maja 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z powództwa K.G.‎przeciwko K.T.‎o rozwód,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Nowym Sączu‎postanowieniem z 24 lutego 2023 r., I C 257/23,‎o oznaczenie sądu właściwego, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w Nowym Sączu jako sąd, przed który należy wytoczyć powództwo (art. 45 k.p.c.). UZASADNIENIE