Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 216/26 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers civil compensation case from Poznan to Wroclaw court due to equal jurisdiction.

Case Number III CO 216/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to review the lower court's decision and instead transferred the case to the District Court in Wroclaw. The plaintiff sought compensation against multiple defendants, while the Poznan court ruled that Wroclaw held equal jurisdiction. The court decided to transfer the matter because the lower court's ruling on jurisdiction was not final and required remittal to the appropriate venue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 k.p.c.: When a court of equal jurisdiction rules on the transfer of proceedings, the Supreme Court shall remit the case to the court designated by the lower court rather than reviewing the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of proceedings equal jurisdiction civil compensation claim remittal to court procedural transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 216/26 POSTANOWIENIE 16 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 marca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa S.Z. ‎przeciwko E.F., K.J., J.N., M.G. i M.G.1‎o odszkodowanie,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu‎postanowieniem z 27 października 2025 r., XII C 924/24,‎o przekazanie do sądu równorzędnego, przekazuje sprawę do rozpoznania Sądowi Okręgowemu we Wrocławiu. [dr][SOP] ‎