Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CO 200/22 AI generated

Supreme Court designates a specific district court as competent for divorce proceedings based on territorial jurisdiction rules.

Case Number III CO 200/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court designated the District Court in S. as the competent authority to adjudicate the divorce case between J. S. and K. M. S. The lower court had previously failed to identify the proper venue, prompting this procedural determination. The court ruled that the designated court holds jurisdiction based on the specific circumstances of the parties' residence and the nature of the dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court competent to hear a divorce case is determined by the plaintiff's domicile or the defendant's domicile, whichever is more convenient for the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce proceedings territorial jurisdiction competent court civil procedure code venue designation plaintiff domicile defendant domicile

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CO 200/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 marca 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa J. S.‎przeciwko K. M. S.‎o rozwód,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 15 marca 2022 r.,‎na skutek przedstawienia przez Sąd Okręgowy w S.sprawy o sygn. akt X RC […]celem oznaczenia sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy, oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w S. jako właściwy do załatwienia sprawy.