Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CB 72/23 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects request to examine judge's independence in Warsaw privatization dispute.

Case Number III CB 72/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request to examine the independence of Judge Mariusz Łodko regarding the privatization case. The applicant, representing the City of Warsaw, argued that the judge lacked impartiality, while the opposing parties maintained the judge's neutrality. The court ruled that the request was procedurally inadmissible as it did not meet the statutory requirements for such a review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 220 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 221 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to examine a judge's independence must be filed within the specific procedural timeframe and substantiated by concrete facts; otherwise, it is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial independence impartiality review procedural admissibility privatization dispute Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 221 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CB 72/23 POSTANOWIENIE 9 lipca 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Mariusz Załucki po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym 9 lipca 2025 r. w Warszawie‎wniosku M. S.‎o zbadanie spełnienia przez SSN Mariusza Łodko wymogów niezawisłości i bezstronności w sprawie II CSKP 2096/22.‎z wniosku Miasta stołecznego Warszawy‎z udziałem M. S., E. S. i Komisji do spraw reprywatyzacji nieruchomości warszawskich‎o wpis 1) odrzucić wniosek, 2) o odrzuceniu wniosku zawiadomić Okręgową Radę Adwokacką w […]. [a.ł]