Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CB 60/23 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects judge recusal request citing lack of impartiality grounds in civil proceedings.

Case Number III CB 60/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Bank's request to recuse Judge X1.Y1 from case III CB 60/23. The plaintiff argued the judge lacked independence, but the court found no factual basis for such a claim. Consequently, the judge was confirmed to continue presiding over the dispute between the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 239 § 1 k.p.c.: A judge's recusal is only justified by specific statutory grounds of impartiality or independence; mere suspicion without concrete evidence does not warrant removal from the case.

Keywords

AI generated
judge recusal impartiality requirement independence of judge civil proceedings Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 238 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 239 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 59/22
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to judge's mandatory recusal under EU and constitutional provisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CB 60/23 POSTANOWIENIE 27 czerwca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Maciej Kowalski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 czerwca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku Banku w W.‎o zbadanie spełnienia przez SSN X.Y. wymogów niezawisłości i bezstronności w sprawie III CZP 59/22‎z powództwa K. T. i M. W.‎przeciwko Bankowi w W.‎o zapłatę na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X1.Y1. wyłączenia od rozpoznania sprawy III CB 60/23 odmawia wyłączenia sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X1.Y1. od rozpoznania sprawy III CB 60/23. (a.z.)[ms]