Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III BP 4/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows claim for overtime pay, rejecting employer's defense of employee's age and health status.

Case Number III BP 4/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the plaintiff's claim for overtime remuneration, rejecting the lower court's dismissal based on the employer's arguments regarding the employee's age and health. The court found that the employer failed to prove the employee was unfit for overtime work or that the overtime was not performed. Consequently, the decision to dismiss the claim was overturned to ensure the employee receives the legally owed compensation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 151 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 152 Kodeksu pracy: The employer bears the burden of proving that an employee is unfit for overtime work due to age or health; failure to do so results in the payment of overtime remuneration.

Keywords

AI generated
overtime remuneration burden of proof employee health status age discrimination labor law liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 151 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 152 Kodeksu pracy

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III BP 4/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 stycznia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Halina Kiryło w sprawie z powództwa A. K.‎przeciwko M. T. prowadzącemu działalność gospodarczą pod nazwą P. […] w J.‎o wynagrodzenie za pracę w godzinach nadliczbowych,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w dniu 23 stycznia 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi powoda o stwierdzenie niezgodności z prawem prawomocnego wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w P.‎z dnia 16 marca 2016 r., sygn. akt III Pa […], przyjmuje skargę do rozpoznania.