Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against Social Insurance Office's refusal to issue written interpretation of labor law.

The Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal filed by the City of W. against the Social Insurance Office's refusal to provide a written legal interpretation. The Social Insurance Office argued that the request lacked sufficient specificity to warrant a formal written response, while the City contended that the request clearly sought clarification on statutory provisions regarding labor benefits. The Court decided to allow the appeal for further examination, indicating that the lower court's dismissal of the request for a written interpretation was not final or correct.