Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CO 136/16 AI generated

Supreme Court designates district court in G. as competent for divorce proceedings initiated by K. R. against R. R.

Case Number II CO 136/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court designated the District Court in G. as the competent authority to hear the divorce case initiated by K. R. against R. R. The procedural outcome was a designation of jurisdiction following a secret session on November 29, 2016. K. R. requested the determination of the proper court, while the opposing party's specific arguments regarding jurisdiction were not detailed in the summary. The court decided based on the rules governing territorial jurisdiction for divorce proceedings, assigning the case to the District Court in G. as the appropriate forum.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court designates the District Court in G. as the competent court for divorce proceedings initiated by K. R. against R. R. based on the rules of territorial jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
divorce proceedings territorial jurisdiction competent court designation Supreme Court ruling civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt II CO 136/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 listopada 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Henryk Pietrzkowski w sprawie z wniosku K. R.‎o oznaczenie Sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy z powództwa K. R.przeciwko R. R.o rozwód,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 listopada 2016 r., oznacza Sąd Okręgowy w G., jako właściwy do rozpoznania sprawy.