Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I ZO 56/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for retrial due to lack of new evidence or procedural error.

Case Number I ZO 56/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the lawyer's request for a retrial inadmissible and left it without consideration. The applicant sought to reopen case I ZB 46/23 but failed to demonstrate any new evidence or procedural violations warranting a new trial. Consequently, the court rejected the motion as legally unfounded under the relevant provisions for retrial requests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 485 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 485 § 2 k.p.k.: A request for retrial is inadmissible if it does not meet the statutory requirements for reopening proceedings, such as the presence of new evidence or a violation of procedural rules.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request inadmissible motion new evidence procedural violation Supreme Court civil procedure case reopening

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 485 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 485 § 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I ZO 56/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 lipca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Zbigniew Korzeniowski po rozpoznaniu 5 lipca 2023 r. wniosku radcy prawnego X. Y. o wznowienie postępowania w sprawie I ZB 46/23, postanowił: stwierdzić niedopuszczalność wniosku o wznowienie postępowania w sprawie I ZB 46/23 i pozostawić wniosek bez rozpoznania. [M. T.][ł.n]