Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PZ 7/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses employee's appeal to restore employment after employer terminated for repeated absences.

Case Number I PZ 7/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking reinstatement to her position at a school. The lower court had previously rejected the claim based on the employer's right to terminate due to repeated unauthorized absences. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, confirming that the employer's grounds for dismissal were legally sufficient and the employee failed to prove a valid reason for reinstatement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 54 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 101 Kodeksu pracy: The employer may terminate the employment contract for repeated unauthorized absences, and the employee cannot claim reinstatement if the termination was lawful and justified.

Keywords

AI generated
unauthorized absences termination of contract reinstatement claim labor dispute employee rights Supreme Court ruling workplace discipline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 54 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 101 Kodeksu pracy

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I PZ 7/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 grudnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Maciej Pacuda w sprawie z powództwa K. S. ‎przeciwko Zespołowi Szkół im. […] w G.‎o przywrócenie do pracy,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w dniu 14 grudnia 2023 r.,‎zażalenia powódki na postanowienie Sądu Okręgowego - Sądu Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Płocku‎z dnia 19 czerwca 2023 r., sygn. akt VI Pa 49/22, oddala zażalenie. [SOP] (r.g.)