Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 586/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 586/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum. The petitioner, S. K., challenged the referendum's validity, while the opposing side argued for its procedural correctness. The court decided to merge the proceedings to ensure a unified and efficient resolution of the shared legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 200 ust. 1 k.p.k.; Art. 200 ust. 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may join related cases for joint adjudication to ensure procedural efficiency and consistent application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
protest against referendum joint adjudication Supreme Court procedure referendum validity procedural efficiency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 200 ust. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 200 ust. 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 586/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wiak w sprawie z protestu S. K.przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień‎15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych 15 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć sprawę o sygn. akt I NSWR 586/23 ze sprawą ‎o sygn. akt I NSWR 178/23, celem łącznego rozpoznania ‎i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. akt I NSWR 178/23.[SOP] [ał]