Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I KO 24/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses retrial request as obviously unfounded due to lack of new evidence or procedural error.

Case Number I KO 24/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland refused the defendant's request for a retrial based on Article 545 § 3 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant argued for a new trial, but the court found the grounds for the request to be clearly baseless. Consequently, the application was rejected without further examination of the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.; A request for retrial must be substantiated by new evidence or a procedural error; requests lacking such grounds are obviously unfounded and must be rejected.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request Criminal Procedure Code obviously unfounded new evidence procedural error Supreme Court dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.
akt III K (…) na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności.
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k
akt III K (…) na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I KO 24/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 27 lutego 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Andrzej Siuchniński w sprawie K. M. A. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu w dniu 27 lutego 2020r., wniosku tego skazanego o wznowienie postępowania zakończonego wyrokiem Sądu Okręgowego w B. z dnia 9 marca 2006r. w sprawie o sygn. akt III K (…) na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności. UZASADNIENIE