Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I KO 20/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses retrial request due to failure to file by a lawyer within the statutory deadline.

Case Number I KO 20/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused the retrial request filed by J. S. because it was not submitted by a qualified lawyer or legal advisor. The applicant failed to correct this formal defect within the prescribed time limit, rendering the request inadmissible. Consequently, the case was returned to the lower court for further proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 545 § 1 and 2 in conjunction with Art. 530 § 2 and Art. 120 § 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; A retrial request submitted without legal representation and not corrected within the deadline is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request legal representation admissibility formal defect statutory deadline Code of Criminal Procedure inadmissible

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 545 § 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
1/ Na podstawie art. 545§1 i 2 w zw.
Art. 530 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 120 § 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
530§2 i art. 120§1 i 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I KO 20/24 ZARZĄDZENIE Dnia 31 lipca 2024 r. 1/ Na podstawie art. 545§1 i 2 w zw. z art. 530§2 i art. 120§1 i 2 k.p.k. odmówić przyjęcia wniosku J. S. o wznowienie postępowania albowiem nie został on sporządzony przez adwokata lub radcę prawnego, a wnioskodawca w zakreślonym terminie nie uzupełnił wskazanego braku formalnego wniosku, 2/ sprawę zakreślić w rep. KO. SSN J. Grubba [J.I.][ms] ‎