Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I KK 35/25 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed as obviously groundless; defendant acquitted of attempted murder and other charges.

Case Number I KK 35/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as obviously groundless, ordering the defendant to bear no costs. The defendant, W. P., was convicted of attempted murder and other offenses by lower courts but sought cassation. The court rejected the appeal because the lower court's findings were legally sound and the arguments lacked merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 400 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 400 § 2 k.p.k.: An appeal is dismissed as obviously groundless when the lower court's decision is legally correct and the appellant's arguments fail to demonstrate any error in the application of law or facts.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal obviously groundless attempted murder criminal conviction Supreme Court legal error costs of proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 400 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 400 § 2 k.p.k.
art. 160 § 3 k.k
skazanego z art. 160 § 3 k.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I KK 35/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 1 grudnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Andrzej Tomczyk w sprawie W. P. skazanego z art. 160 § 3 k.k. i in., po rozpoznaniu 1 grudnia 2025 r., na posiedzeniu bez udziału stron, kasacji obrońcy skazanego od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Koninie z 27 września 2024 r., sygn. akt II Ka 90/24, zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Turku z 29 listopada 2023 r., sygn. akt II K 142/21, p o s t a n o w i ł: I. oddalić kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną; II. zwolnić skazanego od kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego. [J.J.][a.ł]