Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 95/26 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against final judgment in civil dispute over bank payment obligations.

Case Number I CSK 95/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's final judgment. The dispute involved a claim for payment and determination of obligations between the plaintiff and the bank. The court decided to admit the appeal for further examination due to potential legal errors in the lower court's reasoning.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or contains a significant error in the application of legal provisions.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment obligation bank liability civil procedure final judgment legal error appellate review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 1627/22
Appeal court partially allowed consumer claim against bank regarding CHF loan invalidity and interest calculation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 95/26 POSTANOWIENIE 2 czerwca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Tomasz Szanciło na posiedzeniu niejawnym 2 czerwca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa A.K.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W. (poprzednio Bank1 spółka akcyjna w W.)‎o zapłatę i ustalenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Bank spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie‎z 24 lipca 2025 r., I ACa 1627/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [P.L.][SOP]