Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 930/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for reasoning of a procedural order refusing to draft a judgment explanation.

Case Number I CSK 930/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request to obtain a written explanation for its procedural order refusing to draft a judgment. The applicant argued that the lack of reasoning violated their right to a reasoned decision, while the Court maintained that certain procedural orders do not require detailed justification. The court decided that the procedural nature of the order exempted it from the requirement to provide a substantive explanation under the relevant procedural code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 200 § 2 k.p.c.: Procedural orders refusing the drafting of a judgment do not require a written explanation of their reasoning.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural order reasoned decision Supreme Court judgment explanation civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 200 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 930/24 POSTANOWIENIE 21 listopada 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Mariusz Załucki na posiedzeniu niejawnym 21 listopada 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku B. B.‎z udziałem W. P.w przedmiocie wniosku wnioskodawczyni o uzasadnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 5 sierpnia 2024 r., I CSK 930/24, odmawia sporządzenia uzasadnienia. r.g[ał].