Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine payment obligations arising from a specific bank contract dispute.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court accepted the Bank's cassation appeal to have the case remanded for further proceedings. The lower court had previously dismissed the plaintiff's claim for payment and determination of obligations under a specific contract. The Court decided to allow the appeal because the lower court's dismissal lacked sufficient reasoning regarding the contractual terms and evidence presented.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment is based on a violation of the law or if the judgment is contrary to the law, allowing the case to be remanded for reconsideration.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 876/26 POSTANOWIENIE 22 maja 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 22 maja 2026 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z powództwa Z.W.przeciwko Bankowi S.A. w W.o ustalenie i zapłatę,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Banku S.A. w W.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 12 sierpnia 2025 r., V ACa 1878/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [M.O.][SOP]