Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 829/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to distinguish between different types of civil liability claims.

Case Number I CSK 829/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by participant M. Ż. against the lower court's decision. The dispute involved distinguishing between specific civil liability claims raised by various parties including S. K. and the County of R. The court ruled that the appeal should be forwarded for further examination to resolve the legal distinction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to distinguish between legally distinct claims or misapplied rules regarding the scope of civil liability.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance civil liability distinction Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural error review civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 829/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 października 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z wniosku N. M. ‎przy uczestnictwie S. K., Powiatu R., H. S., M. S., W. S. i M. Ż.‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 października 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestnika M. Ż.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w R.‎z dnia 13 stycznia 2015 r., sygn. akt V Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.