Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 808/19 AI generated

Supreme Court accepts both cassation complaints for review regarding a dispute over payment between a company and the state.

Case Number I CSK 808/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted both the plaintiff's and defendant's cassation complaints for further examination. The case involves a payment dispute between a joint-stock company and the State Treasury regarding a specific project. The court decided to proceed with the review because the lower court's judgment required clarification on the legal basis for the claimed payment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints if the lower court's judgment contains a violation of the law or if the facts are unclear, allowing for a full review of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure payment dispute State Treasury joint-stock company violation of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 808/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 sierpnia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Joanna Misztal-Konecka w sprawie z powództwa Zarządu M. Spółki Akcyjnej w G.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Dyrektorowi Centrum Unijnych Projektów Transportowych‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 sierpnia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych obu stron od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 12 lipca 2019 r., sygn. akt V ACa (…), przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE