Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 800/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review whether standard contract clauses are prohibited under consumer protection law.

Case Number I CSK 800/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the Warsaw Court of Appeal's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that specific clauses in a standard contract were prohibited, while the defendant argued for their validity. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legality of the contractual terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych: When a party challenges the validity of standard contract clauses, the court must assess whether such terms violate mandatory consumer protection provisions or copyright laws.

Keywords

AI generated
standard contract clauses consumer protection law cassation appeal prohibited terms Supreme Court review

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VI ACa 1114/13
Court partially allowed appeal, banning unfair insurance clause limiting hospitalization coverage to 90 days per year.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 800/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa W. K.‎przeciwko W. S.A. w W.‎o uznanie postanowień wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 12 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z dnia 10 kwietnia 2014 r., sygn. akt VI ACa 1114/13, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.