Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 787/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim for payment.

Case Number I CSK 787/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the claim for payment, while the defendants contended the decision was legally sound. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the legal application was correct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly or if the judgment is contrary to the law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance incorrect application of law claim for payment civil procedure code Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 787/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 czerwca 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Strzelczyk w sprawie z powództwa W. M.‎przeciwko L. P. i E. P.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 czerwca 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 17 listopada 2017 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE