Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 786/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine contract invalidity based on new evidence of fraud.

Case Number I CSK 786/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the contract was void due to fraud, while the defendant maintained the contract's validity. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to resolve the dispute on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision is based on a violation of the law or if new evidence justifies a retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance contract invalidity fraud in contract Supreme Court review new evidence standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 786/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa J. S. i H. M.-S.‎przeciwko J. P.‎o stwierdzenie nieważności umowy,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 12 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki H. M.-S.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 24 kwietnia 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.