Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 774/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against administrative tax debt judgment regarding property tax liability.

Case Number I CSK 774/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment ordering payment of tax debt. The plaintiffs argued that the tax authority failed to properly assess their property tax liability, while the state contended the assessment was legally sound. The court decided to proceed with the review of the cassation appeal to determine the validity of the lower court's findings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal when the lower court's judgment violates the law or fails to address a crucial issue, thereby allowing the case for further review.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance tax debt liability property tax assessment administrative litigation Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 786/19
Court dismissed appeal against bank's loan termination, ruling repayment did not constitute a legal condition precedent. The court held that the bank's statement regarding potential withdrawal of termination was merely a suggestion, not a binding condition under Polish Civil Code. Consequently, the loan termination remained valid and enforceable. The appeal was rejected based on the court's interpretation of Article 89 and 94 of the Civil Code. The court emphasized that the bank's statement did not create a legal condition precedent. The appeal was dismissed because the bank's statement regarding potential withdrawal of termination was merely a suggestion, not a binding condition under Polish Civil Code. Consequently, the loan termination remained valid and enforceable. The appeal was rejected based on the court's interpretation of Article 89 and 94 of the Civil Code. The court emphasized that the bank's statement did not create a legal condition precedent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 774/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 września 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mariusz Łodko w sprawie z powództwa H. M. i W. M.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa - Wojewodzie […] i J. B.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 września 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku‎z dnia 22 października 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa 786/19, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE