Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 75/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim for payment.

Case Number I CSK 75/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant company against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a claim for payment between two limited liability companies, with the defendant arguing errors in the lower court's legal application. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in applying the law, necessitating a remand for further proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance material error in law claim for payment limited liability companies remand for proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 75/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 2 września 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa N. sp. z o.o. w W.‎przeciwko M. sp. z o.o. w K. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 2 września 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…) ‎z dnia 16 stycznia 2019 r., sygn. akt VII AGa (…) , przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.